Which of the following is true under the Strip and Gore Doctrine?

Under the Strip and Gore Doctrine, it is required that any reservation of land or an adjoining strip must be explicitly stated in writing to be enforceable. This means that if a grantor wants to reserve a strip of land next to the main parcel when conveying property, this reservation cannot be assumed or inferred; it must be clearly articulated in the deed or the legal documentation involved in the property transfer.

This principle emphasizes the importance of clear communication in real estate transactions and ensures that all involved parties are aware of the boundaries and rights associated with the property. In essence, without that written documentation explicitly reserving the adjoining strip, the grantor risks losing any claim to it upon conveyance of the main property.

The other options do not correctly reflect the nuances of the doctrine. For example, the idea that the adjoining strip is always reserved is inaccurate, as it depends on whether the grantor has included that reservation in writing. Likewise, conveyance does not inherently include the strip unless expressly stated, and the claim that grantors cannot reserve land contradicts the very premise of the doctrine, which allows for the reservation of land if properly documented.